The Canoe Group, Inc.
We're glad you're interested in learning how to speak Canoe.

Complete the form below to begin your journey (press ESC or click the overlay if you want to close this window).

Contact information

Fields marked * are required.

What would you like today?

Please check all that apply.

Archive for Process Tools

Miss Visionary’s Graceful fall Stirs the Pool of Group Wisdom

Thursday, February 17th, 2011
It's down here somewhere
Creative Commons Licensephoto credit: squelchey

Next time you’re meeting and someone is set on hammering home their personal vision or point of view….

what happens if, instead of getting silently irritated or reminding this visionary bulldozer of the “group rules”, instead you could say:

“What about Miss Visionary’s ideas are necessary to us right now?  We don’t want to get too far off-process, but this is clearly important to her.  Let’s all just stop talking for a minute to reflect – one of you will see what we all need to know or learn.”

Great process and learning leadership is when you can help someone climb down from a soapbox with grace – and engage group wisdom all at the same time.

In mid-June, The Canoe Group and friends spent a weekend on the Oregon Coast. We entered a team in the annual Cannon Beach Sandcastle Contest. We loved being with our friends and we built this totally cool and totally transitory thing. We learned a lot together.

The shared leadership of the sandcastle building was a fascinating thing. We had a scale model of Crater Lake, built out of white modeling clay from images captured from Google Earth (see the world from any place and angle). And we had photos and drawings and a gridded site map. The high level vision was set but none of the details… and definitely no job descriptions.

Clay model of Sandcastle

Clay model of Sandcastle

We were a team of four women and four men. Our team’s natural leadership style was “I’m just going to go ahead and do what I think needs to be done next.” Because we knew collaborating was key, our approach meant we were all not only working, but also continually scoping and commenting on each other’s efforts and choices. “I like that” got said a lot. Also, “do you need help?” Because we were working side-by-side in a 21 x 21 foot square plot this approach pretty much flowed.

A few of us spent the day noticing and commenting on what seemed to be working, what seemed to NOT be working: saying things out-loud that galvanized team problem-solving. The “learning leadership” role meant everybody’s creativity stayed involved. New team ideas were shaped all day long. (Note: this “talking about it” method seemed mildly irritating to some of the team members who only wanted to dig-dig-dig. )

Everyone has their own technique for doing drippy trees.

Everyone has their own technique for doing drippy trees.

And the third form of leadership – process leadership – we shared, too. “What’s next?” and “who wants to do it?” was a continual refrain. About the time one of us got tired of digging, another one would step in. Some of us stood ready to do “whatever the team needs next”. By the time we came to the drippy trees, it was totally clear who wanted to do them. Others of us said things like, “I’m really lousy at drippy trees.” Whatever worked, we went with.

My personal favorite “lesson learned” was that by the end of the day, we had named everything – the “popsicle sticks”, the drippy trees, the rim, Wizard Island, Mt. Scott, the carved edge. We knew which tools worked: what we’ll bring again next year. A thoroughly satisfying team experience. Rare, even on a lovely, warm June day at the beach.

Categories : Process Tools

Improving Strategic Dialogue In Nonprofit Organizations, Part 1

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

I am often in the position to be a silent witness to some of the great facilitated conversations we have with our customers. I’m there for a purpose: to document the session with photography and a transcript. A transcript is one of many tools we use to help our customers, and its existence has a wide variety of effects. This is the first in a series of blogs describing these effects.

A highly selective view from the front of the room.
A highly selective view from the front of the room. Photo credit: David Frackelton

So why does The Canoe Group use a transcript to document group planning discussions? While there are many reasons, the most important is to capture what really happened at the meeting.

We have all participated in meeting where someone was driving a particular agenda. Agendas are a shorthand for what I would call stories we are committed to. Planning meetings are rich with stories and here is an abecedarium of agendas I’ve witnessed and transcribed:

  • We should get rid of A (person, practice or program) in our organization that is in the way of the progress we should have been making on B (person, practice or program).
  • I’m afraid that if we start doing the C project everyone is excited about, critical issues D and E will become much worse.
  • We have a new opportunity here to do F better and I’ve got to personally push it or it won’t happen because G (person, practice or program) is in the way.
  • We are in a deep crisis and leadership by H (person or committee) is required.
  • We continue to be stuck talking about issue I all these years and yet the problems of J and K have not gotten any better in spite of many conversations like these in the past.
  • Those big personalities (L, M and N) do most of the talking and we need to hear other voices in the room, particularly from O.
  • I’ve got to get a complement in about P (person, practice or program) from Q (funding institution) so that they pay attention to me the next time R (funding request) happens.
  • The R, S and T board committees aren’t doing their job and that needs to be fixed by U right away.
  • I’ve got this wonderful story about how things used to be and how important it is to remember V (person, practice or program) as it applies to current situation W.
  • X is what we have been doing successfully for years and we need to continue to improve it before we look at Y and Z programs.

I’m sure that some of these stories sound familiar, as this is the normal “stuff” of facilitated meetings. Individuals’ preoccupation with their stories is not misbehavior or even a problem, but rather what happens when groups of people get together to talk about things they are passionate about.

These stories frequently find their way on to flip charts and into the group exercises used in facilitated meetings. When passed through the filter of group decision making, the stories influence and guide the subsequent reports, action plans and operational activities. Stories are the important learnings that need to be exposed in order to support the next stage of development of an organization.

So about our frequent use of transcripts… we’ve found they are an important part of a thorough technical analysis of a planning session (one of several I’ll be talking about over these next few entries). Transcripts provide a meaningful way for participants to review and reflect about the meeting. They are frequently essential documents when an organization has a lot of history or a critical problem to solve.

Next time I’ll write about what we do with these transcripts and particularly the use of wordle.net as an analytic tool during and after the meeting.

Categories : Process Tools